<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>忠誠度 on Notes47y</title>
    <link>https://blog.notes47y.win/tags/%E5%BF%A0%E8%AA%A0%E5%BA%A6/</link>
    <description>Recent content in 忠誠度 on Notes47y</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>zh-TW</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.notes47y.win/tags/%E5%BF%A0%E8%AA%A0%E5%BA%A6/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>LCC 會員經濟學：低成本航空的忠誠度戰爭</title>
      <link>https://blog.notes47y.win/posts/2026-04-09-lcc-loyalty-economics/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.notes47y.win/posts/2026-04-09-lcc-loyalty-economics/</guid>
      <description>全球頭部航空公司帳上背負超過 US$300 億的點數負債，低成本航空的忠誠計畫卻只能影響旅客決策的 15%。三重詛咒（低頻次、高沉睡率、低附加收入）讓傳統忠誠模型結構性失效。這篇分析 AirAsia、easyJet、虎航三種突圍模式與 12% 法則。</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
